High-temperature crucibles are essential in industries dealing with the melting of metals, crystal growth, and chemical processes at very high temperatures. Applications requiring high-performance crucibles mainly employ molybdenum and tungsten. The following will provide a detailed comparison of molybdenum and tungsten crucibles, including practical guidance on selecting the appropriate material for specific applications.

Molybdenum crucibles are widely used in metallurgy, electronics, and crystal growth owing to their very high thermal conductivity and excellent compatibility with molten metals. They find common applications in melting non-ferrous metals, pulling silicon or CVD crystals, and the processing of special alloys either under vacuum or inert atmospheres. Due to their non-polluting properties, for instance, Mo crucibles are commonly employed in the melting of semiconductor-grade silicon to provide an inert, stable environment.
The important features and benefits of molybdenum crucibles include:

Tungsten crucibles are preferred in extremely high-temperature applications where molybdenum may reach its thermal limits. Tungsten's melting point of 3,422 °C makes it suitable for processing refractory metals, high-purity metals, and certain ceramics that require ultra-high temperatures. Common applications range from the melting of tantalum, rhenium, or molybdenum alloys to acting as containers for high-temperature CVD diamond synthesis or specialty crystal growth.
Important characteristics and advantages of tungsten crucibles are as follows:

Selection of the proper crucible depends on several temperature requirements, chemical compatibility, size, and cost. These factors listed below will guide selection:
Molybdenum is the appropriate choice for processes operating below approximately 2,000–2,200 °C, while tungsten should be selected for ultra-high-temperature applications above 2,500 °C.
Both metals perform well in vacuum and inert atmospheres, but each must be protected from oxygen at high temperatures. Tungsten, in particular, oxidizes much more rapidly in air than molybdenum does.
Molybdenum offers the advantage of a much lower density, which translates to easier handling and lighter crucibles, especially in larger sizes. Tungsten, however, has a higher thermal conductivity and significantly greater strength at extreme temperatures, providing superior thermal uniformity under high stress.
From a cost and fabrication standpoint, molybdenum is generally less expensive and easier to machine. Tungsten is more costly due to its higher density, greater difficulty in fabrication, and the higher price of the raw material itself.
For application-specific guidance, molybdenum crucibles are commonly used for melting semiconductor silicon. Tungsten crucibles are preferred for melting other refractory metals or for high-temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. In vacuum furnace crystal growth, both may be suitable, but tungsten is favored where higher temperatures or longer-duration melts are required.
Molybdenum and tungsten crucibles both have very vital uses in high-temperature industrial and laboratory applications.
{{item.content}}
{{item.children[0].content}}
{{item.content}}